Jeff Potter (jonl) Thu 17 May 01 07:15
Email from Jeff Potter: OK, I'll check out this weblog stuff some more. I'm starting to get the drift, but some descriptions posted don't seem to be helping the blog cause. I'm still reading that the blog scene is bloggers linking to other bloggers. So it's still hard to see where the content fits in. How is a blog different from a bookmarks list? It sounds like a bookmarks list links you to content but a blog links you to blogs. Then there's the mentioned blog "buzz" angle, that's faster than the WELL, Newsweek, etc. Does content have a buzz? OK, maybe a little. Zinesters were pretty proud of being the first to tell people about HK movies...about UFC fight tapes...of making porn cool. Ha...funny stuff to be proud of. How about getting the word out about anarchy? But all that stuff wasn't buzz, it was longterm encroachment of something truly new. It was cool, too. But not that fast. Maybe that's a cyber difference. "Cyber"...ha...there's a rusty old term. So, my own links-list hooks up to a couple dozen high-end info sources for freaky modern folkculture stuff. http://www.outyourbackdoor.com/links.htm If you have a question about bikes, there are a hundred bike sites, but I link to a few best personality-driven ones to save you time. Just like you guys say: it's a filter. OK, I admit that my list is lame, specialized, wandering. OK, I do see how if I worked on it more that it could be WAY more useful, and maybe it would start taking on a life of its own. BUT I still don't see that I'd be linking to different KINDS of sites. I'd just have tastier sites covering a more useful range. I still don't think it would be a blog or that it would link to blogs or that blogs would pay me the time of day. What am I missing? ...Obviously: experience with blogs. Ha ha. It just seems like me and blogs woulda run into each other already. What a whiner. It *IS* weird to think that "pure info" can be part of fashion. But when you talk about "buzz" and when Mr. Blogger Inventor says that blogging is about "Frequency, Brevity, and Personality" and that damning "lightweight content" and how he saw that blogging was about "format not content" it seems like fluffy fashion is a big part of blogging. Me 'n' fashion go WAY back. The neighborhood teens always scowl at me when I tell em: "Ya know, the secret is that uncool is the coolest. When you make your own scene, you step right to the front of the line. Chicks dig it. Go on, try it, start with something easy, like a different hat." You should see the gears grind in their head, the pain. They laugh at me, but I'm laughing, too. And I'm the only grownup hanging with them, talking to them, and they know I'm "in" at a lot of places, that I keep having fun. It makes them very nervous. Well, enough hassling...let me see if I can learn something firsthand about this blogging. --JP Jeff Potter ****
Jon Lebkowsky (jonl) Thu 17 May 01 07:17
Re #73 - Jim Leftwich has joined our panel!
Rafe Colburn (rafeco) Thu 17 May 01 08:38
I think that many blogs aren't about linking to other people who have blogs at all. For example, at rc3.org, I almost never link to another blog, but I exchange email with a few people who maintain other blogs fairly frequently. My content is pretty eclectic. I have a lot of techie stuff, because I'm a techie. I have a lot of political stuff, because I'm interested in politics. Outside of that, it's mostly things that give me a laugh.
Jeff Potter (jonl) Thu 17 May 01 09:31
Email from Jeff Potter: Affinity and identity groups. Slang for "hobbies and cliques." In zining's heyday these things were busted up, hooked into each other so that they tended to disappear into everyday life. It was this way in the early Net, too. Before I knew about zining, I knew that in real life most people weren't specialized, they did a bunch of things that kinda covered all the bases of life, they were generalists. People who used bikes weren't "cyclists" they were people who used bikes. And their essential interests weren't different from people who didn't use bikes. A regular person riding a bike was keeping nobody down anywhere else. He was NOT getting ahead at anyone else's expense. A person walking was as much his friend as anyone else. They didn't have "issues." I thought that existing media worked to keep people apart and promote the silly lie that people were labels. Obviously, the media only did this to sell stuff and make people easy to manipulate. But lots of people refuse to play this game. They squeeze out between the cracks and join up elsewhere, like mercury, like water. I made my zine and website to reflect all this stuff and basically for no other reason. Via Mike Gunderloy's F5 we all found out about each other. All the different freaks. You know, who lived and thought really differently from each other, but who were civil to each other as we checked out all our scenes. I had my redneck huntin'n'bikin thing going on. The city slickers hooked right into me and I into them. We expanded. I met my first Southerners and Punks and they were swell folks. There was no end to it. It was open-ended. Come one come all. Is this how zining and webbing still is? Jeff Potter
Jeff Potter (jonl) Thu 17 May 01 09:33
Email from Jeff Potter: Speaking of content...here's some zines I like... Have you heard of them? *"Oop" by Joey Harrison. http://members.accesstoledo.com/joey/jhwq_TOC.htm Keeps getting bad reviews in ARG. Includes quite a few stories of his childhood with great B&W photos of little him with his buckteeth and hornrim glasses and his glamorous 50's mom going off on field trips together. They look like publicity still, they are so cool. There's very stylish photographer genes in that family. They visited MAD magazine HQ. They went to a black Chicago nightclub where he got to listen to his favorite drummer. He got to be the annoying brat tagging along with his cousin to a Stones concert where she screams "Paint it black, you devils!" which gets on the classic live album. He reprints one of his mom's diary entries, in her Palmer hand, about the cute things little Joey is up to. These should be made into a book. Kicks David Sidaris's ass. *"Inspector 18" by Michael Jackman. Clean, wry tales of...bootcamp...building a squat in NYC. MJ is a nerd but he has stuck is neck out and writes about it as elegantly as you can possibly find. *"Axian Kix" by Steve Kostecke. Perfect reports on life in SE Asia. He's been there a few years. Describes the dating rituals of Koreans in full. "66 Slices of Seoul" is over the top. Takes the cake for travel writing. Oh, and half of it is about the sex trade. He's part of it, but not so much as a tourist. Just living in Seoul, doing what the guys do, and what that's like. The $5 girls. It's not no-holds-barred, no there's a huge culture and etiquette built up around all this stuff. You get it all here. Plus all the varients in the neighboring countries. Ambivalent, yes, to say the least. Not always such cozy writing, let's say. *"New Philistine," "Zine Beat," and "Pop Lit", all by Karl Wenclas. Criticism of lit and movies. Lots of news, info and behind the scenes stuff on the literary world. Lots of hardcore constructive suggestions. Karl is a waterfront import/export broker. You know, "I coulda been a contenda." He gives a very practical, no fussy-stuff, totally intelligent spot-on look at culture. *Freak out at the old farts. http://thedailybugle.com and http://texasgang.com. The one is old fart Jack Saunder's site (author of many zines and 185 suppressed books on our culture, his life and how the two get along so well). The other is old fart Wild Bill Blackolive's gang site. You know, a real gang, with outlaws, dealers, bikers, ex-con's, vets, lawyers, and dead guys. They're old now and, you know, some dead, but they are the real deal. It takes Texas outlaws to hang it out in public like this. Texas is scary but now I see better how it works. Wild Bill wrote one of the most violent books ever, set in the Wild West, but based on his life and friends, of course. It was very weird to read about the outlaw Bix Bayless then get an EMAIL from him. Textfiles there for the novel. If you liked "Blood Meridian" you'll just pop a gasket. http://www.jagular.com/crad/ for Crad Kilodney's "Dead Man Talking." Another old fart who's been living the homeless way by selling his writings on the streets of Toronto for years. Books with titles like "Putrid Scum" and "Foul Pus of Dead Dogs." Jeff Potter
Rafe Colburn (rafeco) Thu 17 May 01 09:34
I like to think so.
Rafe Colburn (rafeco) Thu 17 May 01 09:34
http://www.syntheticzero.com (mitsu) Thu 17 May 01 11:10
Again, the thing to do is to actually go and read some blogs (of course I recommend the ones I like, above, but there are plenty of others to choose from). Actual experience, as you say, is worth a thousand conjectures... Blogging is not just about linking to other blogs; in fact, most of my links (and most of the links on any blogs) are to content; I thought that was fairly clear from the descriptions already posted, but I'll repeat that again just for the sake of repetition. (Buckminster Fuller once said this in praise of repetition: http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/intro/note.html)... The point about linking to other blogs *as well* as content (and blogs often contain content as well as links, I should also repeat) is that this enables self-organization (for an online introduction to this meme, check out: http://platon.ee.duth.gr/~soeist7t/Lessons/lesson0.htm). So, right now, before we go on, please follow the links to some of the blogs mentioned above, so we have something in common to talk about. I will repeat some from my lists again: http://www.lemonyellow.com, http://www.alamut.com, http://www.nqpaofu.com, http://www.geegaw.com, http://www.caterina.net, http://www.syntheticzero.com/deeper.html. ... Okay. As you can see, we've got content, links to content, commentary on content, and the occasional link to another blog. What's the point? Instead of CBS and NBC and Time-Warner telling us what's going on, we can give our attention to alternative sources of information. Every weblog is a filter, among other things, of the vast quantity of information out there. In this respect there is a strong similarity to zines: a desire to bypass the major media. How is this different from a bookmark list, or using a search engine? The thing about search engines is that you're just going to look for things you already intended to find in the first place. For example, Jeff, you mentioned that you haven't run into weblogs before --- why not? Is it possible that this is because you're just looking for things you already knew about? I found out about weblogs from an email from a friend. Somebody has to tell you about something: it's either going to be a friend, a friend of a friend, a major media outlet, or something else. The point, for me, of reading a weblog that I enjoy, is finding things that I wouldn't have expected to find, a new thought, a new website, a new set of articles, new content. When weblogs link to each other, this gives me a greater horizon than I would have had if I had just been looking in the same ways I'd been looking before. The question is not whether you're going to be selective or not. It sounds good to say that you're open to everybody, but the reality is we all only have 24 hours in each day. You can't fill that up with everything, so we select. It's the problem of attention: we all have limited attention. So the question is, do we devote this attention to the things the major media tell us to pay attention to? Do we devote it to just the things we already know about, or only the things we go out and search for (which are going to be related to the things we already know about)? Or do we let our network of possible sources of information grow beyond the boundaries of the things we already know?
Laurel Krahn (lakrahn) Thu 17 May 01 12:20
Jorn Barger's Weblog FAQ: http://www.robotwisdom.com/weblogs/index.html an oldie, but goodie. I second the recommendation for http://www.rebeccablood.net/essays/weblog_history.html Weblog Madness is also a fine place to read about weblogs and find weblogs: http://www.larkfarm.com/weblog_madness.htm
Jeff Potter (jonl) Thu 17 May 01 15:25
I confess. I've let e-lists and newsgroups replace zining in my life. I have a seasonal cycle of newsgroups and lists that I contribute to. I keep up on all kinds of news this way, too. I know that this would tend to be promoting affinity groups. But don't worry, I do my best to keep them all cross-polinated. I've declared on alt.zines that my posting there is my zining. I put up content, reviews, provocations. It's zining. It's cheap, quick and it works. Well, a bit. I post off-topic to beat the band. But that's part of my cross-training campaign. I explain each time how the off-topic post really isn't. I show how some general thing relates to the charter. So I bring up race and zining, gardening and zining. In the bike racing newsgroup, I remind them that modern sports is a part of worker celebration. That the bike racer represents the pride of the bike commuter going off to his factory job. I remind them that a sports addiction isn't any better than any other kind. It's not trolling, it's promoting modern folkways, which is my OYB theme. As in my paper zine, I work in the newsgroups and lists to show how their specialized charters are actually related to everything else in real life. Man, you should see the feathers fly when I get going in the fly-fishing newsgroup about sustenance fishing. Ha...I just got done with some yeasty foment in the bike.tech group about how to improve manual push reel lawnmowers. People started writing in about how doing yardwork by hand helped their bike riding. Yer darn tootin, I said, c'mon, let's hear it! It was totally off topic, but I harnessed the bike spirit and showed how it applied to the rest of life. So that's how my paper zining has fallen off. But I'm still zining! Well, also, my last paper issue was huge. And I have done all those books. So I'm still paper scening. But I've been doing more weaving in the public Net. It's as good a place as any. ...Except it does seem to too narrow. And there's the clique, geek and flamer factors to consider. Ever more so, it seems like newsgroups/lists are a pack of SIX pals and enemies who aren't even into their topic. They flat out don't like to see anyone posting but them. Not the greatest audience. But that fast/quick tasty thing about posting is hard for me to resist. As you might notice. --JP Jeff Potter
Jeff Potter (jonl) Thu 17 May 01 15:26
Email from Jeff Potter: And for another thing.... : ) (Man, I just don't know when to.) Another way I've evolved in my paper zining is that I'm doing zinebooks. I got a bit tired of the mag lite format. A dabble here and there. A whimsical mix. I decided to kick out the whole jams. Find things no one else is covering, no one else is being honest about, and publish books on it. It's been a blast. 23 books! Yeah! Zinebooks fit fine in with zines. Zines are a good way to promote zinebooks, for starters. This "next step" thinking fits in with what was posted about zinesters going into the maintream. But zining is about informality, the real world sure ain't. I think there's sell-out there. I've worked for a bunch of mags. You have to lie. You can't say what you know. How can ex-zinesters help the mainstream when it's all about posing and lying? Books are the same way. The mainstream books on zines and by zinesters that came out sure weren't what I call zinebooks! They were polished products sold to quirky affinity group niches (punk music! kooky sex! tattoos!). A real zinebook tears down walls, crosses over niches, bangs em up, ties em together, creates new channels and new modes in book publishing. Sez me. Mine do. Man, zinebooks feel like real meat'n'taters, real cultural contribution. If you check out the blurbs on mine at http://outyourbackdoor.com/OYBPress.htm maybe you can sense the far out fun and heavy lifting going on. But aren't books even further from blogs? (Ouch. Sorry to keep picking on those sweet lil blogs!) Who'd read a WHOLE BOOK? Not very many, I've found. My zine has been lots more popular than my books so far. (Altho I've had a couple hotsellers.) Even my friends make the sign of the cross at the mention of a book. It has to be on NPR before they'll read it. And they lament about no good books. But they'll read a zine. They just don't get it. School gives books a bad rep, I guess. Or maybe it's just the pain of thinking. Thinking of blog frequency, I'm going to be keeping these exact same books in print the rest of my life. They'll never be out of date. Pushing the brain is no steenking fad buzz. I'll just keep adding titles as needed, when they are ready. I'm building something, permanent like. Has heft to it. I'm going to start printing them myself, too. Make some neat art editions. Show my kids how to do it. Computers make me appreciate craftsmanship that much more. What a funny direction for a computer geek zinester. OK, enough harping. Yeah, zinester vibe COULD help mags and books. I'll try not to be an idiot. Never say never. (Dang, it got long again! I hate that! Where are my pithy one-liners??) --JP Jeff Potter
Linda Castellani (castle) Fri 18 May 01 21:37
e-mail from Jeff Potter: Heck, I even consider posting reviews to Amazon.com to be zining. I love doing that. I like seeing how many people were helped by my review. Then folks can go to the homepage I made. I think they can even get to my website (used to anyway). I like the arguing that goes on in that customer review stuff. I like helping sell stuff I like and discouraging trash. It's power to the people. It's zining. It's my shortest post. --JP Jeff Potter **** *Great Lakes Press * http://www.glpbooks.com (#1 publisher of engineering license reviews & discounts on techbooks) *Out Your Backdoor * http://www.outyourbackdoor.com (friendly zine of modern folkways and cultural rescue...with bikes)
Thomas Armagost (silly) Sat 19 May 01 17:01
<scribbled by silly Mon 9 Jul 12 15:48>
snow poster city (kalel) Sat 19 May 01 19:39
So. I'm in Philadelphia, and I've been doing my FC-endorsed community organizing work, meeting with about 25 readers of the mag at the Dock Street Brew Pub to complain about bad bosses, discuss the dotcom "correction," and philosophize on what history doesn't teach us. Clue: Read "The Crossing," a novel-like take on Washington's battle against the Hessians. I never knew the Brits hired German mercenaries to fight the patriots during the Revolutionary War -- why don't they teach us that in grade school? Lots to reply to as I wait for my room-service grilled cheese. (Room service isn't zine-like, but grilled cheese is, no?) I'm going slightly schizo balancing the posts here about blogging vs. zining. IMO, blogs are not zines, are not electronic versions of zines, are basically digital parallels to the old-school Utne Reader. Not that they don't have their parallels: peer-to-peer interaction, connections between members of disparate communities of interest, the referential -- and occasionally self- perpetuating self-referential -- nature of reviews and cultural pointers. I might share my screed on how they differ -- and how they're awkward partners in this dance of an extended Inkwell conference -- but for now, some detached responses. Re: content as buzz. Yes. It is so. Content breeds memes. For a take on Seth Godin's recent FC work on "idea viruses" -- conscious meme seeding -- check out http://www.fastcompany.com/feature/meme.html . Re: P2P content-developing as a replacement for zining. Art Kleiner wrote an OK look at leaving writing (zining) behind for participating in online communities -- http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/6.10/newmedia.html?pg=5 . Among the dangers: The not getting paid or rewqrded for your contributions... the distributed (not collected) results, which make for harder finding and digesting... and so on so on so on. Re: zinebooks. (Am I only replying to Jeff? Sheesh, maybe I ought to go back to alt.zines or that sustenance fishing conference he mentions. ^_^) I'm all for self-publishing books. And I continue to think that until everyone everywhere is online, books will remain the way that big ideas get shared widely. Oh, sure, they'll be shared importantly online -- and the economics and politics of book publishing are fucked up -- but I continue to trust the multiple-leveled vetting process that goes into publishing books (despite nonfiction's lack of fact checking and the marketing dynamic that guarantees that few truly great books reach the mainstream, much less the libraries) as a filter for my reading. Let's introduce e-books into this conversation. Not e-books in terms of the artist formerly known as the Rocket E-Book, but online self-publishing. I just got a copy of Richard DeGrandpre's "Digitopia" -- http://www.randomhouse.com/atrandom/catalog/display.pperl?isbn=0679647074 . Reads -- and reeks -- of "Being Digital" and neo-Luddite cautionary tales about how the Net is bad for paper, etc. And one would think that this book would be welcomed (by me) and potentially interesting. But, really, it feels like someone found another backwoods philosopher (Burlington, Vermont, and a psychologist, really) to warn us on information overload. And I'm wondering whether March 2001 wasn't too late, too late for this book to list. Whether the essays should have stayed standing as standalones. And whether the book was published merely because Random House could come out with a bust- relevant book in paper and "e" formats. If the media is the message, I need a massage.
http://www.syntheticzero.com (mitsu) Sat 19 May 01 22:18
Here's one big architectural feature of weblogs that deserves mention at this juncture: referrer logs. You can see who has referenced you, who has linked to you. An excellent way to find people who might not be willing to actually write or email you, but who are interested enough in what you have to say to refer to you on their own sites.
Jon Lebkowsky (jonl) Sun 20 May 01 06:57
Heath, I accept that zines and blogs are not the same, exactly, but I think they're descended from the same self-publishing impulse. There's probably a missing link back there somewhere, a tie that binds the two modes of expression...
Jeff Potter (jonl) Sun 20 May 01 08:58
Email from Jeff Potter: I hear ya about "warnings of info overload." Talk about an old record. Somehow I think "they" are using that as some way to get their own agendas advanced. My take of course is the opposite. I think it defuses their scare and points the whole question in a better direction. My take is that there's no good info. There's never enough. Info overload is a herring. As if anyone can really stand to watch much tv or read much of that slick magazining or booking. There's not "so many books." There's hardly any new books. They're book-shaped objects. That sort of thing. My take is that the problem isn't what they say it is. Never is. The problems are always counterintuitive and WORSE than they say. And the finger always points back. Maybe that's where we get this compulsion to publish/write/contribute even when it only puts us further behind. We have to say what needs saying. Damn the torpedos. --JP Jeff Potter ****
http://www.jimwich.com/ (jleft) Sun 20 May 01 13:07
<mitsu> brings up an interesting feature of the blog world - the referral logs. Many sites have links or icons to their referral logs and sometimes I'll go see who's visiting or referring people to particular blogs. It's interesting to follow these back, sometimes uncovering a chain of referrals or who's visiting or referring to what blogs or items. And because the internet shrinks the planet, it's fascinating to see people from Dubai and Malaysia visiting along with people from a Swedish university and a company outside of Boise. Blogs, and the growing infrastructure of blog-related services, facilitate a speeded up feedback loop and awareness of "the territory." Comparitively, when a 'zine publisher distributes a run of 15,000 copies, other than the mail that comes back (or electronic contact), it's not nearly as easy to see where they're going, or where they're having effects on other publications. With blogs, this ability more or less "comes with the package." I think it's nigh on impossible to say "blogs are this" or "blogs are not this" when there's clearly a completely open and wide range of them out there. Many have lateral links off to exteneded essays or articles in addition to a central scrolling log. I see no particular reason why blogs couldn't have the types of interviews or comics or photo-essays that many of the 'zines I enjoyed had. Another thing that's valuable about blogs, especially those like Mike Gunderloy's Lark Farm, is that the web has grown so large and full of amazingly interesting subjects, that having individually-filtered links to fresh tidbits and gems is a valuable resource.
Tara Gillet-Liloia (taragl) Wed 23 May 01 08:59
I think that weblogs are the next step in the evolution of personal homepages. As Web users we created our personal pages, but it was unsatisfying to have a static page without feeling like you were *connecting* to someone or at least offering them something. (The proliferation of public comment functions on blogs has to do with this need for connection, but i won't get into that here..) As I look back now, I see my first forays online as dipping my big toe into the ocean of blogging/OJs. Back then it was posting animated GIFs to cool sites in a big group at the bottom of my page and a bio page that was never quite finished. Today it's more organized, less garish (IMHO) and the links are text with commentary instead of spinning images. But I'm doing the same thing; filtering content through my unique perspective, unearthing Good Sites for those who stop by, and finding a way to connect with other people. Jeff - re: books and blogs. I don't think the point is brevity (no matter what Mr. Blogger Inventor says) but filtering. You can't read every book in the bookstore, so where do you start? This question is even more complicated online. At least in a bookstore the titles are arranged neatly for browsing on shelves. On the Web, you can't get an overview of what's available very easily - there's just too much. Find someone who's tastes pique your interest can at least give you a foothold when climbing into this tangled Web. A comment way back about Boy Scouts prompts this question: What qualifies as a zine? For example, is the newsletter published by a quilter's guild a zine?
Tiffany Lee Brown (jonl) Wed 23 May 01 13:40
Email from Tiffany: on the subject of weblogs, at the risk of alienating everyone... i've dipped around in them before, and spent more time today and yesterday reading some. i looked at some of the FAQs and histories. so far, no blog has made me want to return frequently. the style of writing, the apparent personalities of the bloggers, and the subjects matter were all similar to small mailing list posts, Well topics, Usenet exchanges. but mailing lists, Well topics, and Usenet are inherently interactive. it's okay that we're all writing off-the-cuff and perhaps we're not really that interesting as personalities -- it's like real life. The point isn't that one person in the pile is desperately intelligent or witty; the point is to create a conversation. weblogs seem like conversations, only without those pesky Other People... one person standing on the sofa at a cocktail party, talking to the ceiling fan.
Paper - The Undead Medium (jerod23) Wed 23 May 01 14:57
To continue the bizarre hybrid of 'zines and 'blogs - 'blogs are like the Big Mail of the current decade. Granted, the so-called viral marketting is more like Big Mail, but 'blogs are pretty damned close. Now you attach a 'blog to a webpage and you've got something like a 'zine with a review section attached. Only better, faster, stronger and cheaper. They have their place, but not as any form of replacement of 'zines. Unless you're replacing 90% of the Riot Grrrl 'zines which were little more than networking with other Riot Grrrl 'zines. I'm sure that few publishers of such would appreciate the irony of their being precursors to various porn sites that have very little individual content but buttloads of links to other porn sites with very little individual content but buttloads of links to other porn sites with very little individual content but buttloads of links to other porn sites with very little individual content but buttloads of links to other porn sites with very little individual content but buttloads of links to other porn sites with very little individual content but buttloads of links to other porn sites with very little individual content but buttloads of links to other porn sites with very little individual content but buttloads of links to other porn sites with very little individual content but buttloads of links to other porn sites with...
Paper - The Undead Medium (jerod23) Wed 23 May 01 15:00
And I'm still trying to wrap my head around Jeff's concept of life-as-zining. Unless one is writing the sort of perzine that goes into Proustian details of one's life. Actually, there's a better example, but I'd have to dig up the old News Of The Weird that mentions the name of the guy who recorded in diaries that took up a warehouse every single detail, down the the number of squares of toilet tissue used and how long each dump took.
Jon Lebkowsky (jonl) Wed 23 May 01 15:46
I've been a little surprised at the emphasis on blogs in the first days of our discussion here ... I expected more about zines and webzines with a bit about blogs insofar as they represent the same urge, self-publishing as a means of expression, an art form. And I think there's more to blogs than link lists, but we've covered all that... I was at Kinko's yesterday doing a minor copy-shop chore, and my head drifted back to the FringeWare daze and the many trips Monte McCarter and I made to a different, much older Kinko's, copying and cutting like madmen. The feel of the paper is erotic. There's nothing quite like it. I'm about ready to make another zine. One of the biggest disappointments of my adult life was hearing that we couldn't get enough $$ together for another issue of Unshaved Truths... I built the last and best issue using WordPerfect 5.1 for DOS 'cause Steve Brown was cooking SF Eye that way... I had to paste the illos onto the boards. No greater thrill than completing a board after working blind, and finding that everything fits....
Mark Binder (realfun) Thu 24 May 01 10:49
When I was the editor of the Rhode Island Jewish Herald, they used to do paste-ups the old fashioned way. They'd typeset the stories, and then we'd cut them up, and run them through the wax machines, and lay them out on story board paper. Lines were adjusted with xacto knives, and holes were filled by ad council ads that were lined up on the side. I used to call it the Nursury school time, but it was very relaxing.
Tiffany Lee Brown (jonl) Thu 24 May 01 17:35
Email from magtiff! a question for Cory: i notice a number of your links come from Well people, and then you say "thanks <login>" next to them... are these folks sending you URLs or are you harvesting them from conferences? just curious.
Members: Enter the conference to participate