inkwell.vue.352 : P.W. Singer, Wired For War
permalink #76 of 82: John Payne (satyr) Sun 19 Jul 09 19:04
    
Headline: Air Force Plans for All-Drone Future

Okay, take it with a grain of salt, but the subtext is that the days of 
Air Force resistance to the use of drones are over.

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/07/air-force-plans-for-all-drone-future/
  
inkwell.vue.352 : P.W. Singer, Wired For War
permalink #77 of 82: pseudoanthropos (abloner) Mon 22 Feb 10 05:03
    
The whole business makes me sick.
  
inkwell.vue.352 : P.W. Singer, Wired For War
permalink #78 of 82: Brian Slesinsky (bslesins) Mon 22 Feb 10 19:49
    
I'm not so sure. When there's plenty of time to get a close-up view
without putting the pilot's life at risk, it allows for more patient
decisions.
  
inkwell.vue.352 : P.W. Singer, Wired For War
permalink #79 of 82: Michael C. Berch (mcb) Tue 23 Feb 10 00:45
    
Israel Rolls Out World's Biggest UAV

Rattling a saber and marketing a product at the same time, Israel
rolls a new Unmanned Arial Vehicle into action.

The Eitan or Heron is not just any drone. It's a whopper as big as a
Boeing 737, capable of staying in the air for 20 hours and capable of
reaching Iran. 

Full story:
<http://liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/02/22/israel-rolls-out-worlds-biggest-
uav/?test=latestnews>

Other coverage:
<http://www.theage.com.au/world/giant-israeli-drone-puts-iran-within-range-2010
0222-orp1.html?autostart=1>
<http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3851377,00.html>
<http://www.defense-update.com/features/2010/february/eitan_rollout_21022010.ht
ml>
<http://blogs.zdnet.com/emergingtech/?p=460>
  
inkwell.vue.352 : P.W. Singer, Wired For War
permalink #80 of 82: John Payne (satyr) Fri 26 Feb 10 08:53
    
Big + not stealthy + slow = sitting duck.

What's new here is hang time and range, otherwise 1990 vintage cruise 
missiles are more of a threat.

The message is probably on the order of "this is just the tip of the
iceberg."
  
inkwell.vue.352 : P.W. Singer, Wired For War
permalink #81 of 82: Michael C. Berch (mcb) Sat 27 Feb 10 00:26
    
Except for the electronics (and electronics are cheap - it's software
development that costs money) the thing looks fairly low-tech, though
fuel-efficient, and probably pretty cheap to produce. 

So if you attack (say) Iran, what happens if you send 1,000 of them? Or
more? Even with moderate attrition, you're way ahead. You can even
send waves of them to distract air defenses. Send some high, some low.
Decoys.  They don't even all have to carry ordnance.  It's a game-changer. 
  
inkwell.vue.352 : P.W. Singer, Wired For War
permalink #82 of 82: John Payne (satyr) Sat 27 Feb 10 12:22
    
Armed with very fast, medium range, anti-radiation (anti-RADAR) missiles,
set to launch a few seconds before the remotely controlled host ship was
destroyed by RADAR controlled ground-to-air or air-to-air missiles, it
certainly could be.  Not only do you get the other side to expend
ordinance, but you have a good shot at taking out their RADAR at the same
time.
  



Members: Enter the conference to participate

Non-members: How to participate


Non-members: Please enter your comment or question:
All non-member comments are read before posting. All spam is discarded.

Your email address:
We will only use this email address to contact you for clarification.

Your real name:
Your name will be used to identify your comment if it is posted.



Subscribe to an RSS 2.0 feed of new responses in this topic RSS feed of new responses

   Join Us
Home | Learn About | Conferences | Member Pages | Mail | Store | Services & Help | Password | Join Us