SILICON SOAPWARE wafting your way along the slipstreams of the Info Highway from Bubbles = Tom Digby = bubbles@well.com http://www.well.com/~bubbles/ Issue #224 New Moon of March 11, 2013 Contents copyright 2013 by Thomas G. Digby, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See the Creative Commons site at http://creativecommons.org/ for details. Silicon Soapware is available via email with or without reader feedback. Details of how to sign up are at the end. ********************* This year's Spring Equinox hasn't happened yet, but there are definite signs of Spring. The days are getting longer, the weather is a bit warmer and sunnier (although more chilly wet weather is possible), and just a few nights ago this area set its clocks ahead for the summer. Nowadays, unlike in days of yore, we don't have to actually set all those clocks. Some, such as the ones in our computers and cell phones, are smart enough to set themselves. Others, mostly hidden away in the equivalent of an engine room, are on Universal (aka "Greenwich") time which doesn't get reset for summer or winter. From their point of view people (and the clocks most people are looking at) just sort of shift one time zone in whichever direction is appropriate for the season. But there are still a few clocks that aren't hooked into any such automated system, and thus need to be reset manually. I can think of five that I'll need to set, including the one in the car. So some semblance of the tradition remains to mark the changing seasons. Maybe in some year to come we won't really pay attention to the change at all. One fine spring morning we'll just feel a bit less rested than usual when the alarm goes off, and we may notice that it's darker outside when we set out for the office and that it stays light later in the evening, but we won't have to pay conscious attention to setting clocks at all. There will be mention of the change in the news, but that's just for people with old-fashioned clocks and most of us will more or less ignore it. And some gray-haired granddad will tell the kids about how when he was a boy he had to set all his clocks by hand twice a year, back and forth depending on the season, and if someone forgot to do that they had the embarrassment of showing up at church or work or whatever an hour late or early, depending on how they should have set their clocks. He might also tell them he had to walk barefoot three miles through snow to get there, but that will probably be an exaggeration, and even if it happens to be true the kids may not believe him. ********************* A discussion in another forum got me to thinking about the song, "Twinkle Twinkle Little Star". According to the Wikipedia article it was first published, as a nursery rhyme, in 1806. That makes the second line, the one about wondering what the star is, more appropriate than it may seem to us at first glance, because astronomers back then knew much less about the nature of stars than they know now. Of course there's still a fair amount we don't know about stars, so the song isn't obsolete yet. ********************* In some worlds parallel to ours where magic is stronger than it is here, computers usually still work but tend to become rather cartoon-like. That can be useful in that it is sometimes possible to persuade the machine to do what you want it do to without all the nitpicking about exact programming that we have to put up with here. But there are dangers. For example, if some Web site seems to be loading too slowly, resist the urge to speed it up by dragging that progress bar that shows you how much has been accomplished so far. While that sometimes seems to work (in contrast to this world, where it generally has no effect), if you aren't careful you can create a data suckage condition in which all the data from every other computer in the vicinity ends up in your machine, leaving all the others empty. Even if that doesn't cause widespread crashes, other users will be unhappy at your computer having sucked up all their data. Worse, your machine can destabilize into something like a supernova explosion or even an information black hole into which specially trained and equipped adventurers must venture, at great peril, to retrieve what bits and pieces they can. While some have returned from such explorations bearing great treasures from realms never before conceived of by humans, others have been less fortunate. Many never return. So the standard advice for when something is loading slowly is to avoid the temptation to drag the progress bar. ********************* Prediction: A majority of children born today in the US will never learn to drive or apply for a driver's license. The reason? By the time today's kids reach driving age, self-driving cars will be so common that driving will no longer be considered a necessary skill for the general population. It will be looked on much as horseback riding is today. Since young drivers are statistically a high-risk group, there may be considerable pressure, possibly in the form of higher insurance rates and more restrictive licensing criteria, for them to let the car do the driving. So even among those who apply for licenses, fewer may succeed in getting them. And if one's chances of getting a license are smaller, and there is not as much real need for it as there is now, many simply won't bother applying. ********************* Will self-driving cars offer a choice of driving style settings? For example, it seems reasonable to offer a choice between optimizing for fuel economy or for getting to your destination sooner, assuming both can be done without significantly affecting safety. I suspect the degree of allowable flexibility will depend on traffic conditions at any given moment. If there's nobody else around you can choose to go at the vehicle's most economical speed without worrying about impatient people behind you. Or if you're in a hurry, you may choose to go faster, assuming it's safe. On the other hand, when traffic is heavy going with the flow and not gumming things up will take priority. Some people might prefer other options, such as having people notice their expensive status-symbol vehicle. This is less likely to be officially sanctioned, but some brands might have a subtle bias toward that policy hidden in their programming, even if their ads only hint at it. Other options, such as expressing one's competitive macho manhood, are unlikely to be legally available. But you might be able to find them on some sort of underground hacker market. Whatever happens will probably include a bunch of alternatives nobody today has thought of yet. ********************* More thoughts on the eventual transition from manually driven cars to robots, especially as it may affect stunt drivers and automobile racing. Will the sport of auto racing fade away, or will it remain as a specialty thing, sort of like horse racing is today? And what of stunt drivers in movies? Will they continue to be in demand, or will advances in animation technology make them unnecessary? Or will stunt-driving robots be developed? Will live actors in general remain as important to movies as they are today? ********************* Thoughts of robots, along with other things in the news, reminded me of a story titled "Good News from the Vatican" by Robert Silverberg. It's about a robot being elected Pope. I'm pretty sure that won't happen until long after robot cars become common, if ever, although you never know. A robot cleric would seem to have an advantage in that it would be immune to human failings, although that may be balanced by other failings that afflict robots but not humans. It could also be argued that to be effective as a spiritual leader, one must share some of the nature of those one is setting out to lead. That could be a point against robot clergy serving humans. But then again, who knows what new gods may show up tomorrow? ********************* Recently I was having dinner with a bunch of people (mostly neither fan nor Pagan). The dish I ordered came with a slice of garlic toast that I didn't want. I asked if anyone else at the table wanted it. Nobody did. So it sat there for an hour or two until the waitress eventually picked it up and threw it away. That led to thoughts of a new superhero. This person would come up to anyone who looked like they were done eating but still had food on their plate. He(?) would give the standard lecture about children starving in some other country or wherever. If the person gave the standard rebuttal about sending it to them, our hero would do just that. He would gather up the uneaten food and fly, like Superman, to deliver it to whatever children were most in need. Details aren't fully set yet. Does he take plates of half-eaten food away and come back a few minutes later with the plates all nice and clean? Or does he avoid carrying those often-heavy china plates all over the world and back by scraping everything into a sack which he carries like some kind of reverse Santa Claus? Does he carry insulated Hot and Cold containers, along with food safety guidelines? Questions are many, while answers are few. And no, he probably doesn't want kids to put uneaten food under their pillow at night, like with teeth for the Tooth Fairy. That would get real messy real fast. And, also unlike the Tooth Fairy, he doesn't hand out money. That would just encourage people to leave more leftovers, which is not what he wants to do. Also, he probably would just as soon not get involved with the banking system and the credit card companies and PayPal and all that. Keep it pure, and keep it simple. ********************* One thought from a conversation at Pantheacon: There's a whole industry based on making people ashamed of their bodies. They sell stuff to "repair" or hide or otherwise deal with whatever it is about their bodies people are ashamed of. And if people ever quit being ashamed, those industries would be in deep trouble. There are other industries based on the idea that people's bodies are beautiful and can be made even more so. These two categories, augmenting beauty and hiding defects, are fuzzy and they overlap, but you can see the differences between them if you look closely. My personal preference is to support the beauty-enhancers but not the shame-based stuff. Your preferences may vary. ********************* THE SPEECH With a dignified tap of his polished mahogany gavel The chairman calls to order the annual meeting of The Association of Distinguished Professors, And introduces the man who will give The keynote address: Doctor So-and-So, Distinguished Professor And author of a number of books, With a Doctor of Dignity degree From some prestige college. Amid polite applause This distinguished professor approaches the lectern, Reaches into a hidden compartment, And brings out a small plastic bottle. Using the wand that came with the bottle, He blows out over the audience A cloud of bubbles. "Speech" concluded, he returns to his seat. The toastmaster feels impelled to summarize: "The point Doctor So-and-So was making Was that no matter how grown-up we appear on the outside, There is still that child inside us all Who must now and then be let out to play." He drones on for a while about repression, and stress, And life expectancies, and percentages of heart attacks, And stuff like that until finally, "While it is often important for us As distinguished professors To project a certain image to the world, It is also important for us As human beings To now and then allow ourselves to play." "That was indeed my point," replies the professor, "And you have summarized it quite well. However, just for the record, I must remind you That what I actually said was:" And blows another cloud of bubbles. written Oct 01 83 0415hr entered Oct 24 83 0015hr Thomas G. Digby ********************* HOW TO GET SILICON SOAPWARE EMAILED TO YOU There are two email lists, one that allows reader comments and one that does not. Both are linked from http://www.plergb.com/Mail_Lists/Silicon_Soapware_Zine-Pages.html If you are already receiving Silicon Soapware you can tell which list you are on by looking at the email headers. If the headers include a line like this: Silicon Soapware zine with reader comments you are getting it via the list that allows comments (some software may hide part of the line, but there should be enough visible to recognize it). To comment, simply email your comment to ss_talk@lists.plergb.com (which you can often do by hitting "Reply All" or "Reply to List") from the address at which you got the zine. The list will not accept comments from non-member addresses. If the Subject line includes the phrase "SS_Talk Digest" you are getting the digest version. Otherwise you're getting individual items as they are posted. The address for posting comments is the same either way. If, on the other hand, there's a line like "Silicon Soapware no-reply" you're on the zine-only list. This list does not expect comments nor does it accept replies for posting. If you need to contact the author use bubbles@well.com or bubbles@plergb.com. If you are receiving Silicon Soapware and want to unsubscribe or otherwise change settings, the relevant URL should be just below this section in the copy you received. Or you can use the plergb.com URL at the beginning of this section to navigate to the appropriate subscription form, which will also allow you to cancel your subscription or change your settings. -- END --